If You're Reading It on the Internet Abraham Lincoln

The stray art of lying past telling the truth

(Epitome credit:

Getty Images

)

The line between truth and lies is becoming ever murkier, finds Melissa Hogenboom. There's even a discussion for a very unlike grade of lying.

I

It is no clandestine that politicians frequently lie, simply consider this ­– they can practise so just by telling the truth. Dislocated?

That statement becomes clearer when you realise that we've probably all done it. A classic case might be if your mum asks if yous've finished your homework and you respond: "I've written an essay on Tennessee Williams for my English language course." This may be true, but it doesn't really respond the question almost whether your homework was washed. That essay could take been written long agone and y'all have misled your poor mother with a truthful statement. You might not have even started your homework yet.

Misleading by "telling the truth" is so pervasive in daily life that a new term has recently been employed past psychologists to describe it: paltering. That it is so widespread in lodge at present gives united states more insight into the grey surface area between truth and lies, and perhaps even why we prevarication at all.

Near of u.s. tell more than i prevarication per day (Credit: Everett Collection Inc/Alamy)

We lie all the time, despite the fact that it costs us considerably more than mental effort to lie than to tell the truth. US president Abraham Lincoln one time said that "no man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar".

In 1996 one researcher, Bella DePaulo even put a figure on information technology. She institute that each of u.s.a. lies about once or twice a solar day. She discovered this by request participants for ane week to annotation down each time they lied, even if they did so with a good intention. Out of the 147 participants in her original report, just seven said they didn't lie at all - and we tin can merely gauge if they were telling the truth.

Many of the lies were adequately innocent, or even kind, such every bit: "I told her that she looked good when I thought that she looked like a blimp." Some were to hide embarrassment, such as pretending a spouse had non been fired. DePaulo, a psychologist at the University of California Santa Barbara, says that the participants in her study were non aware of how many lies they told, partly because about were so "ordinary so expected that we simply don't notice them".

It is when individuals apply lies to manipulate others or to purposely mislead that it is more than worrying. And this happens more ofttimes than you might think.

The truth is not always what it seems (Credit: Chris Rout/Alamy)

When Todd Rogers and his colleagues were looking at how often politicians contrivance questions during debates they realised something else was going on. By stating another truthful fact, they could get out of answering a question. They could fifty-fifty imply something was truthful when it was not. Politicians exercise this all the time, says Rogers, a behavioural scientist at Harvard Kennedy School. He and colleagues therefore prepare out to understand more about it.

He found that paltering was an extremely common tactic of negotiation. Over one-half the 184 business organisation executives in his study admitted to using the tactic. The enquiry also establish that the person doing the paltering believed it was more ethical than lying outright.

The individuals who had been deceived, yet, did not distinguish between lying and paltering. "It probably leads to too much paltering as communicators recollect that when disclosed, it will be somewhat ethical, whereas listeners see information technology as a prevarication," says Rogers.

Politicians commonly manipulate the truth (Credit: Getty Images)

It is also difficult to spot a misleading "fact" when we hear something that on the confront of it, sounds true. For instance, the UK'southward Labour Party entrada video to lower the voting age said: "Yous're 16. Now y'all tin can get married, join the Army, work total-time." The BBC'due south reality check team discovered that these facts practise not tell the whole truth.

"You can simply join the Army aged xvi or 17 with your parents' permission," the Reality Bank check squad wrote. "At that age yous also need your parents' permission to go married unless yous do so in Scotland. Since 2013, sixteen and 17-year-olds cannot work full-fourth dimension in England, but can in the other three dwelling nations with some restrictions."

In another instance, the then-presidential-nominee Donald Trump paltered during the presidential debates. He was questioned about a housing bigotry lawsuit early on on in his career and stated that his visitor had given "no admission of guilt". While they may not have admitted it, an investigation by the New York Times found that his company did discriminate based on race.

And even if we do spot misleading truths, social norms tin can prevent us from challenging whether or not they are deceptive. Have a now infamous interview in the UK, where journalist Jeremy Paxman interviewed the politician Michael Howard (pictured below). He repeatedly asks Howard whether he "threatened to overrule" the then prisons governor. Howard in plough, continues to evade the question with other facts in a bizarre substitution that becomes increasingly awkward to spotter. Not many of the states are comfortable challenging someone in that way.

Paltering is a common negotiation tactic (Credit: BBC)

While information technology's common in politics, and then too is it in everyday life. Consider the estate agent who tells a potential buyer that an unpopular property has had "lots of enquiries" when asked how many actual bids there have been. Or the used motorcar salesman who says a car started up extremely well on a frosty forenoon, without disclosing that it bankrupt down the calendar week before. Both statements are true but mask the reality of the unpopular property and the dodgy car.

Paltering is possibly and so commonplace because it is seen every bit a useful tool. It happens considering we constantly have then many competing goals, suggests Rogers. "We want to achieve our narrow objective – [selling a business firm or machine] – only we also want people to see usa every bit ethical and honest." He says these ii goals are in tension and past paltering, people believe they are being more ethical than outright lying. "We show evidence they are making a mistake," says Rogers.

Nosotros can meet the problems this sort of thinking can cause reflected in society today. The public are clearly ill of existence lied to and trust in politicians is plummeting. One 2016 poll plant that the British public trust politicians less than estate agents, bankers and journalists.

And despite the fact that we now frequently expect lies from those in power, it remains challenging to spot them in real time, especially so if they prevarication by paltering. Psychologist Robert Feldman, writer of The Liar in Your Life, sees this as worrying both on a personal and on a macro level. "When we're lied to by people in ability, it ruins our confidence in political institutions – information technology makes the population very contemptuous about [their] real motivations."

Lying can and does clearly serve a devious social purpose. It can help someone paint a better picture than the truth, or aid a politico dodge an uncomfortable question. "It's unethical and information technology makes our democracy worse. But it'south how human cognition works," says Rogers.

Unfortunately, the prevalence of lies might stem from the fashion nosotros are brought upward. Lies play a role in our social interactions from a very immature age. Nosotros tell young children about tooth fairies and Santa, or encourage a kid to be grateful for an unwanted nowadays. "We give our kids very mixed messages," says Feldman. "What they ultimately learn is that even though honesty is the all-time policy, it'southward also at times fine and preferable to lie about things."

So adjacent time you hear a fact that sounds odd, or someone to be deflecting a question, be aware that what you think is the truth may very well be deceptive.

---

Melissa Hogenboom is BBC Future'south characteristic writer, she is @melissasuzanneh on twitter.

Join 800,000+ Future fans by liking us on Facebook , or follow us on Twitter .

If you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter , called "If Y'all Only Read 6 Things This Week". A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Capital, and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

mcconnellbutragreake72.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20171114-the-disturbing-art-of-lying-by-telling-the-truth

Share this post